While watching Season 3, Episode 5 of Downton Abbey, I found myself focusing on the ways in which the
episode related to Gérard Genette’s piece, “Order in Narrative”. As Genette explains, there is the time of the
story and then there is the time of the telling, which he calls narrative
time. The writers’ use of anachrony, or
chronological inconsistencies, stood out to me from the very beginning of the
episode.
While the narrative lengths of breaks between episodes are
always seven days, the lengths of the gaps in the time of the story have varied
a great deal. Gaps between previous
episodes have ranged from a few days to many months. Since the length of the gap in “story time”
between episodes is always different, I look forward to seeing how much time
the creators will write-in before continuing the story in the next
episode. In this instance, while the
break in narrative time was seven days, the gap in “story time” between Episode
4 and Episode 5 was only a couple of days, as evidence by the death of Lady
Sybil at the end of Episode 4 and Lord Grantham saying goodbye to the visitors
paying their respects at the opening of Episode 5. I was happy to see that not much time had
passed between Sybil’s death and the beginning of Episode 5. This use of time gave the writers a great
opportunity to develop characters and character relationships in the context of
Sybil’s death, which was a highly emotional ordeal for most characters in the story. For example, with Sybil’s death still fresh
in the minds and hearts of the characters and audience, the writers were able to
more fully develop the issues in Robert and Cora’s relationship.
My favorite example of anachrony in this episode occurred
during the scene in which Daisy tried to teach Alfred how to do the foxtrot in
the servants’ hall. I assumed that this
scene would simply be another goofy example of the awkward tension between
Daisy and Alfred, but a short line from Daisy changes the feel and purpose of
the entire scene. When she shows Alfred
how to hold his arms, she pauses and says that it reminded her of when Thomas tried
to show her how to dance the grizzly bear.
This internal analepsis, as Genette would call it, takes the audience
away from the present moment in the story and causes one to think back to a
seemingly insignificant moment from Season 1.
Then, a close-up shot of Daisy is used as she says, “It was a long time
ago. A lot has happened since then”. And in that short moment, the viewer is reminded
of the many events that have occurred since Daisy and Thomas danced in the servants’
hall. Personally, I thought of the war, William’s
death, Matthew’s injury, Sybil and Branson, Lavinia Swire, and Bates’ trial, just
to name a few. In the tradition of a
serialized narrative, all of these stories and events came together at once,
connected by the common thread of Daisy’s memory.
There are numerous other examples of how the writers used
the discordance between narrative time and story time to develop the plot. Which were your favorites?
I'm very intrigued by these moments of anachrony and analepsis--especially Daisy's reference to dancing the "grizzly bear" with Thomas! Another similar moment that struck me was Cora and Robert's continued narrative restaging of the moments of Sybil's death itself--the way in which the scenario is continually rehashed, with attention to Sybil's "chances" and who is to blame.
ReplyDeleteWhat do others of you think?